One of the series of complaints on deceptive cookie banners.
Data | Podsumowanie |
---|---|
15.11.2024 | Appeal to Supreme Administrative Court by controller Tried an appeal at the constitutional court. The constitutional court said there is no relevant constitutional matter at stake. Therefore, there is now an appeal at the supreme administrative court. Information provided by the BVwG. |
05.08.2024 | BVwG Decision Article 7(3) GDPR also means that refusing consent must be as easy as giving consent. A link is not comparable to a button. Media exemption is not applicable. Controller appeal is rejected. |
01.07.2024 | Submission noyb to BVwG Issues continue to be the same |
17.06.2024 | Controller submission to BVwG Still no reject option in the first layer |
27.05.2024 | BVwG visited the website to make its own assessment of the facts Possibility for a submission on its evidence finding |
27.05.2024 | noyb submission to BVwG |
14.02.2024 | noyb submission to BVwG |
31.01.2024 | BVwG sends appeal of controller Asks for submission of complainant |
16.01.2024 | DSB informs about controller appeal at BVwG |
14.12.2023 | Decision by DSB Order to adapt website |
13.09.2023 | noyb submission Market standard is not a legal argument. Violations are there again. |
17.05.2022 | noyb meeting with controller noyb had a meeting with the controller where the controller explained how OneTrust makes it impossible to disable the new types of cookies added to CMP from the default 'always active' function. |
05.03.2022 | Banner mostly fixed The banner has been fixed and the only violation Type I which is persistent is according to the Controller - 'a technical issue' which they are clarifying with OneTrust. |
04.03.2022 | DSB sent us the controller statement |
29.12.2021 | Submission sent to DSB Submission sent to DSB. |
02.12.2021 | DSB forwarded submission DSB forwarded the submission of the controller. |
05.10.2021 | DSB forwarded the complaint DSB forwarded the complaint to the respondent with a four-week deadline (ie till approx. 2 November 2021) to reply for them. |
10.08.2021 | Complaint filed |