This case concerns the "pay or okay" approach by various news outlets.
| Data | Summary |
|---|---|
| 05.12.2024 | LDI informed they sent the case file to controller Controller can then check if they want anything redacted. LDI will then decide if something will be redacted. |
| 07.11.2024 | Update from LDI DPA claims the website improved: They do not send your data to advertising brokers before you interact with the banner and you have more granular choices. But the essence of pay or okay is accepted. Asks if we want a formal decision. |
| 07.11.2024 | Requested formal decision from the LDI |
| 12.09.2024 | Update request to DPA They already considered a violation in the past, but do not issue a decision |
| 05.09.2023 | noyb answers that access to controller submissions would be needed |
| 04.09.2023 | LDI answers they do not consider that the right to be heard is affected |
| 25.08.2023 | noyb insists on right to be heard |
| 24.08.2023 | Answer to LDI Highlighted that steps against the controller should be taken. Asked about the possibility of a submission. |
| 24.08.2023 | DPA answer They will continue the procedure if the current measures are not sufficient. |
| 23.08.2023 | Another update request sent to DPA |
| 24.04.2023 | Status request to SA |
| 07.11.2022 | DPA reminded that we sent complaint DPA sent an email stating that they did not receive the complaint. Noyb answered with the DPA confirmation receipt of the complaint and asked for the current status of the procedure. DPA sent message that there is no news regarding the procedure. |
| 07.09.2021 | Coordination of SA |
| 13.08.2021 | Receipt SA |