This is one of noyb 101 complaints which were filed after the "Schrems II" judgement in Summer 2020. The judgement invalidated the EU-US data transfer mechanism "Privacy Shield". The cases were generated based on implemented Google Analytics or Facebook tracking code on websites by EU providers, which leads to unlawful data transfers to the United States.
| Fecha | Summary |
|---|---|
| 07.03.2022 | AP informed us that they generelly do not share a controllers statement with a complainant AP informed us that the controller has replied to their inquiry on 05.03.2021 but the AP generelly does not share a controller's statement with a complainant. |
| 17.02.2022 | noyb again asked the AP for an update noyb again asked the AP for an update, also requesting access to the file. |
| 14.07.2021 | noyb asked the AP for an update |
| 04.03.2021 | noyb sent the correct representation agreement to the AP |
| 03.03.2021 | We were contacted by the AP We were contacted by the AP (Dutch DPA, which are now handling the case as the controller is based in the Netherlands. They said the representation agreement was incorrect. |
| 29.10.2020 | noyb asked the the AEPD if they consider themselves competent to handle the complaint and asked for access to the files of the case |
| 28.10.2020 | We received a letter by the AEPD In mid-October 2020, we received a letter by the AEDP outlining the further course of the procedure. |
| 18.09.2020 | AEPD confirmed of receipt of the complaint |
| 16.09.2020 | noyb sent followup email to the AEPD |
| 17.08.2020 | Complaint |