C007 Netflix

Our statement to the "concept decision" was forwarded to the Dutch DPA by the DSB who shared similar concerns against the "concept decision". The DPA is in contact with the Dutch-DPA regarding the case and there will (with high likelihood) a decision in two parts (the first part beeing an ex-officio decision without our further participation). The DSB announced that we will receive this information in writing as well.

Unclear if DSB has raised objections against the AP's draft decision.

They have forwarded our submission to the AP, which will either issue its actual draft decision now, or yet another "preliminary draft decision".

We would need to send an email asking them to ask the AP to provide them with Netflix' submissions and the AP's investigation report, so the DSB can provide them to us.

We should also ask for extension of deadline if we want to base our submission on these new documents as well.

including letter by the AP of May 2022. DSB confirmed to us that both cases (C007 and C008) are handled by the AP.

Our appeal of 01.04.2022 has not yet been received by the BVwG. noyb then sent an E-Mail to the DSB asking them for an update

Since we have not heard from the DPO (or the AP) regarding D130.199 and D130.274 since 11.05.2021 and our last submission of 07.06.2021 has remained unanswered for more than four months now, we kindly request that the open applications (see our submissions of 07.06.2021 and 05.03.2021) be dealt with and that an update on the status of the procedure pursuant to Article 77(2) of the GDPR be provided.

third access request + clarification on the party status of the complainant

According to this, the lead supervisory authority has an internal report of the investigations
regarding Netflix International B.V., which is not (yet) published in IMI or otherwise available to the
or is otherwise not accessible to the Austrian data protection authority.
The Austrian data protection authority has suggested that a separate
party hearing regarding the (summarised) results of the investigation even before the
(summarised) investigation results prior to the publication of a draft decision in IMI. The decision of the
supervisory authority on this matter in the next few weeks.

The data protection authority has again contacted the Dutch supervisory authority in response to your request of 10 October 2019 and asked about the status of the procedure.

The complaints of 18 January
2019 were examined and classified as a cross-border complaint case in which the lead authority is a foreign partner authority. foreign partner authority.
By decision of 31 January 2019, the proceedings were suspended.

noyb requests whether a decision on the LSA has been reached

The DSB stays the procedure while the LSA has been identified.

Complainant claims violation of Article 15 GDPR due to incomplete response provided by the controller.