This is one of noyb 101 complaints which were filed after the "Schrems II" judgement in Summer 2020. The judgement invalidated the EU-US data transfer mechanism "Privacy Shield". The cases were generated based on implemented Google Analytics or Facebook tracking code on websites by EU providers, which leads to unlawful data transfers to the United States.
| Datum | Summary |
|---|---|
| 13.02.2024 | Information from VG Munich VG München informs us that we can get access to the court file only in person and that the case file of the proceeding in front of the BLM is not at court since it is not foreseeable when a court date will be decided. |
| 17.11.2023 | Letter by BLM Via a law firm: The BLM refuses to provide the data subject/noyb with the actual decision taken against Sky. |
| 12.10.2023 | German law firm announces their representation of the BLM ... and asks for an extension of the deadline to reply to the lawsuit. |
| 31.07.2023 | BLM lets us know that they will take more time to handle the case ... a problematic reaction after just having being sued for inactivity. |
| 26.07.2023 | Administrative Court Munich confirms receipt of lawsuit |
| 05.07.2023 | Inactivity lawsuit againt BLM Requesting court to order BLM to take a decision. |
| 03.05.2023 | Bavarian DPA told us to stop asking for updates and that the complaint is still under investigation |
| 25.04.2023 | noyb asked for an update again |
| 22.11.2022 | Update by BLM Procedure ongoing ... coordination with 101 task force.... no news |
| 24.08.2022 | BLM refuses access to case file Following our submission of June 2022 |
| 07.06.2022 | noyb filed a reply asking the BLM to not apply national provisions denying access noyb filed our reply, asking the BLM to not apply Art 20(2) BayDSG because violation of EU law (equivalence). |
| 23.05.2022 | BLM wrote us again denying access to the files BLM wrote us (via postal letter), again denying access to the files (Art 20(2) BayDSG). |
| 25.04.2022 | noyb filed a submission We filed our statement, including another request for access to the files |
| 31.03.2022 | BLM provided us with a summary of the statements by the controller and Meta BLM provided us with a summary of the controller's and FIL's statement and gave us the opportunity to make a statement. No deadline set. |
| 09.02.2022 | BLM informed us that the decision will still take sime time due to high workload |
| 09.11.2021 | BLM informed us that investigations age ongoing BLM informed us that investigations against FB are ongoing and that they are assessing FB's replies together with the other DPAs. |
| 09.08.2021 | BLM informed us that the complaint continues to be under investigation BLM informed us that the complaint continues to be under investigation and that they still have not received the controller's statement (with trade secrets removed). |
| 25.05.2021 | BML replied that we wont get access to the files BML replied that we won't get access to the files as not foreseen by local law; however, we will receive the controller's statement (with trade secrets removed). |
| 10.05.2021 | noyb asked for access to the case files We responeded to BLM and problems with FB (mirroring argumentation in oe24). We also asked for access to the file. |
| 10.05.2021 | BLM replied BLM informed us on the status and problems with FB and promised us Sky's Stellungnahme. |
| 11.02.2021 | BLM contacted us saying that they are waiting for the controllers statement and that they will keep us in the loop |
| 16.11.2020 | BLM confirmed to be the competent DPA BLM confirmed to be the competent DPA for Sky Deutschland. However, cannot rule out that cross-border nature of proceedings may result in change of competence later on. Confirm they have receive no documents from addressed authorities in connection with the case. |
| 29.10.2020 | noyb asked for an update |
| 14.10.2020 | BLM stated that the complaint has been forwarded to Sky for their statement |
| 07.09.2020 | Bayern DPA wrote that the complaint has been forwarded to Media DPA of Bavaria Bayern DPA wrote that the complaint has been forwarded to the competent Medienbeauftragter für den Datenschutz (BLM; there is an special DPA for media companies). |
| 17.08.2020 | Complaint |